Insights & news
In-depth content on operations, efficiency and change management for high-performance organizations.
You don't have AI. There are 30 uncoordinated ChatGPTs.
then in a meeting with the CEO. It shows me the screen: ChatGPT open. Smile. “Ricardo, we have finally entered the age of AI.” I take a deep breath. I choose my words carefully. This isn't the first time we've talked about AI — in previous diagnoses, the topic had already appeared. But saying it there, in a formal meeting, with the board present and the budget for the next cycle on the agenda, has another weight. "Maybe not yet, the way you're thinking. You have 30 uncoordinated ChatGPTs — what the technology market today calls 30 personal agents without organizational coordination. It's not exactly the same thing as having AI in the company."
Today's challenge is not to start using Artificial Intelligence, but rather to transform pilot projects into measurable value at the executive level. The reality is harsh: while 82% of companies report some positive ROI, 95% of pilots die before reaching production, creating the dreaded "Pilot Gap." The cause of this failure is not a lack of budget, but a failure of method: Lack of strategic alignment with business priorities. Fragmented or ungoverned data. Excessive focus on tools rather than solving real problems. The difference between the average and the leadership is stark: companies that scale AI with governance and method achieve $10.30 return for every $1 invested, almost triple the average of $3.70. For the Council, the success metric is clear. What defines who climbs: Focus on real business problems. Based on organized data (Data Readiness). AI KPIs tied to executive compensation and auditable governance from the outset. Before approving the next investment in technology, the Board's test must be one: the question that matters is not "are we using AI?". It's: "Are we getting a measurable return from AI — and do we have a plan to scale?" If the answer is not clear, your investment in innovation is at risk.
Why 66% of advisors are not prepared for the most important decision of the next decade The adoption of Artificial Intelligence has gone from being a trend to becoming a fait accompli: 88% of organizations already use AI in at least one business function. What did not keep up with this speed was governance. Most Boards of Directors still treat AI as a technology agenda — delegated to the CTO, discussed in 15 minutes at the end of the quarterly meeting, with no oversight framework and no risk metrics. This mismatch is not just an operational gap. It is a fiduciary exposure. This article presents the framework that Boards need to adopt to oversee AI with the same rigor applied to capital allocation and financial risk management.